Skip to content

Estate of Lowrie: Elder Abuse Standing

Share this post

118 Cal.App.4th 220, 12 Cal.Rptr.3d 828

The Denver Post Office and Federal Court House

Rule of Law: The Elder Abuse Act, as outlined in the Welfare and Institutions Code section 15600 et seq., aims to protect vulnerable elders from various forms of mistreatment, including abuse and neglect. Additionally, Probate Code section 259 serves as a forfeiture statute, deeming abusers of elders or dependent adults to have predeceased the decedent, thereby prohibiting them from benefiting from the abuse.

Brief Statement of Facts: Laura Marie Lowrie (the decedent) had three children, including Norma Goodreau, Alan Lowrie, and Sheldon Lawrence Lowrie (Sheldon). Lynelle L. Goodreau, Norma Goodreau’s eldest daughter, was one of the decedent’s six grandchildren. Decedent’s estate included various assets, such as gold coins, commercial property, residences, and an airplane parts business. Sheldon, as the executor and trustee, played a significant role in managing the estate. Lynelle initiated a lawsuit against Sheldon, alleging elder abuse, financial exploitation, and neglect. The trial court found Sheldon guilty of elder abuse and awarded damages to Lynelle.

Analysis: The court first addresses Sheldon’s argument regarding Lynelle’s standing to bring the elder abuse case. Despite Sheldon’s assertion that Lynelle lacked standing, the court emphasizes the legislative intent behind the Elder Abuse Act and Probate Code section 259, which aims to deter elder abuse and ensure fair outcomes. The court determines that Lynelle, as a beneficiary with a contingent interest in the estate, has standing to pursue the case, particularly considering the potential conflict of interest if Sheldon were expected to bring the lawsuit against himself. The court cites precedent and legislative purpose to support its conclusion that Lynelle’s standing is essential to fulfilling the goals of the statutory scheme.

Holding: The court affirms the judgment, confirming Lynelle’s standing to bring the elder abuse case against Sheldon. Additionally, the court orders Sheldon to pay all costs associated with the appeal.

This opinion underscores the importance of standing in elder abuse cases and highlights the legislative intent to protect vulnerable elders from exploitation and mistreatment.